an After abortion

REAL, CONFIDENTIAL, FREE, NON-JUDGMENTAL HELP TO AVOID ABORTION, FROM MANY PLACES:
3,400 confidential and totally free groups to call and go to in the U.S...1,400 outside the U.S. . . . 98 of these in Canada.
Free, financial help given to women and families in need.More help given to women, families.
Helping with mortgage payments and more.More help.
The $1,950 need has been met!CPCs help women with groceries, clothing, cribs, "safe haven" places.
Help for those whose babies haveDown Syndrome and Other Birth Defects.
CALL 1-888-510-BABY or click on the picture on the left, if you gave birth or are about to and can't care for your baby, to give your baby to a worker at a nearby hospital (some states also include police stations or fire stations), NO QUESTIONS ASKED. YOU WON'T GET IN ANY TROUBLE or even have to tell your name; Safehaven people will help the baby be adopted and cared for.

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

FINALLY: Proof That The New York Times and The Boston Globe are both Die-Hard Abortion Advocates:
It wasn’t supposed to be this way. You weren’t supposed to be graduating into an America fighting a misbegotten war in a foreign land. You weren’t supposed to be graduating into a world where we are still fighting for fundamental human rights, whether it’s the rights of immigrants to start a new life, or the rights of gays to marry, or the rights of women to choose. You weren’t supposed to be graduating into a world where oil still drove policy and environmentalists have to fight relentlessly for every gain. You weren’t. But you are. And for that, I’m sorry."

~ Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr., Chairman of the Board, The New York Times Company.
Which also owns "...the International Herald Tribune, almost two dozen other regional newspapers in the United States (15 of which publish daily), nine local television stations, and two New York City radio stations, including the legendary WQXR. In 2005, it had 35 web sites, including NYTimes.com, Boston.com and About.com."

For the above quote, Sulzberger "won the 'Outrageous Quote of 2006' award from the Media Research Center."

"[We] are still fighting for fundamental human rights"?

Really? Guess he doesn't see the irony in his having left the most fundamental right off that list. Guess if you can't buy his newspapers yet, you're not entitled to that one.


THE ABOVE WAS DISCOVERED IN RESPONSE TO READER DAN WHO IS AS ANGRY AS WE ARE AT THE NEW YORK TIMES. I'd suggested he write to the paper, especially the Chairman and top dogs.

Rather than just give you all the names having found them myself, let me "teach you all how to fish." It's so easy!
This is what I got from googling "new York Times" editorial board :
Byron Calame is the readers' representative. His opinions and conclusions are his own. His column appears at least twice monthly on the Sunday Op-Ed pages.
Googling this, "new York Times" publisher , got me to here:

"The New York Times is a newspaper published in New York City by Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr. and distributed internationally. It is owned by The New York Times Company"

That guy is Chairman of the Board. I doubt he will be a receptive ear what with the quote above.

Next google this phrase: johnson@nytimes.com
(any common name usually works in a big company; smith and jones are also good) and you'll see the convention is probably either lastname@nytimes.com or it could be
firstinitiallastname@nytimes.com or just firstname@nytimes.com

This cached google page gives you all kinds of ideas.

So I'd address it to:

Sulzberger@nytimes.com
ASulzberger@nytimes.com
arthur@nytimes.com

Calame@nytimes.com
BCalame@nytimes.com
Byron@nytimes.com


and see what bounces back. Most will, but if at least one for each doesn't, then you know you got through to them both! Or at least those who read their email.

That's how I do it all the time.

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME