an After abortion: Psychological Impact on Women of Miscarriage Versus Induced Abortion: A 2-Year Follow-up Study

REAL, CONFIDENTIAL, FREE, NON-JUDGMENTAL HELP TO AVOID ABORTION, FROM MANY PLACES:
3,400 confidential and totally free groups to call and go to in the U.S...1,400 outside the U.S. . . . 98 of these in Canada.
Free, financial help given to women and families in need.More help given to women, families.
Helping with mortgage payments and more.More help.
The $1,950 need has been met!CPCs help women with groceries, clothing, cribs, "safe haven" places.
Help for those whose babies haveDown Syndrome and Other Birth Defects.
CALL 1-888-510-BABY or click on the picture on the left, if you gave birth or are about to and can't care for your baby, to give your baby to a worker at a nearby hospital (some states also include police stations or fire stations), NO QUESTIONS ASKED. YOU WON'T GET IN ANY TROUBLE or even have to tell your name; Safehaven people will help the baby be adopted and cared for.

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Psychological Impact on Women of Miscarriage Versus Induced Abortion: A 2-Year Follow-up Study

Conclusion: The short-term emotional reactions to miscarriage appear to be larger and more powerful than those to induced abortion. In the long term, however, women who had induced abortion reported significantly more avoidance of thoughts and feelings related to the event than women who had a miscarriage.
From the published study, "Psychological Impact on Women of Miscarriage Versus Induced Abortion: A 2-Year Follow-up Study", Broen, Anne Nordal MD; Moum, Torbjörn PhD; Bödtker, Anne Sejersted MD; Ekeberg, Öivind MD, PhD., in the journal Psychosomatic Medicine: March/April 2004 - Volume 66 - Issue 2 - pp 265-271.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the psychological trauma reactions of women who had either a miscarriage or an induced abortion, in the 2 years after the event. Further, to identify important predictors of Impact of Event Scale (IES) scores.

Method: A consecutive sample of women who experienced miscarriage (N = 40) or induced abortion (N = 80) were interviewed 3 times: 10 days (T1), 6 months (T2), and 2 years (T3) after the event.

Results: At T1, 47.5% of the women who had a miscarriage were cases (IES score 19 points on 1 or both of the IES subscales), compared with 30% for women who had an induced abortion (p = .60). The corresponding values at T3 were 2.6% and 18.1%, respectively (p = .019). At all measurement time points, the group who had induced abortion scored higher on IES avoidance. Women who had a miscarriage were more likely to experience feelings of loss and grief, whereas women who had induced abortion were more likely to experience feelings of relief, guilt, and shame. At T3, IES intrusion was predicted by feelings of loss and grief at T1, whereas avoidance at T3 was predicted by guilt and shame at T1.

Eighty women in the study had had induced abortions, and at the two-year afterward point, most just avoided feeling or thinking about their feelings, and this was predicted by more feelings of guilt and shame in the 10 days immediately following the abortions.

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME