After abortion

REAL, CONFIDENTIAL, FREE, NON-JUDGMENTAL HELP TO AVOID ABORTION, FROM MANY PLACES:

3,400 confidential and totally free groups to call and go to in the U.S...1,400 outside the U.S.	. . . 98 of these in Canada.
Free, financial help given to women and families in need.	More help given to women, families.
Helping with mortgage payments and more.	More help.
The $1,950 need has been met!	CPCs help women with groceries, clothing, cribs, "safe haven" places.
Help for those whose babies have	Down Syndrome and Other Birth Defects.
	CALL 1-888-510-BABY or click on the picture on the left, if you gave birth or are about to and can't care for your baby, to give your baby to a worker at a nearby hospital (some states also include police stations or fire stations), NO QUESTIONS ASKED. YOU WON'T GET IN ANY TROUBLE or even have to tell your name; Safehaven people will help the baby be adopted and cared for.

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

"The Pill Makes Women Pick Bad Mates", By Jeanna Bryner, Senior Writer, LiveScience.com, 12 August 2008

Not only is this study's publication brand new this week, its findings apparently have already been observed and published after being "fully peer-reviewed to the highest standards," quietly and without any media coverage I'm aware of, 11 years ago:

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes are involved in immune response and other functions, and the best mates are those that have different MHC smells than you. The new study reveals, however, that when women are on the pill they prefer guys with matching MHC odors.
...
Past studies have suggested couples with dissimilar MHC genes are more satisfied and more likely to be faithful to a mate. And the opposite is also true with matchng-MHC couples showing less satisfaction and more wandering eyes.

"Not only could MHC-similarity in couples lead to fertility problems," said lead researcher Stewart Craig Roberts, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Newcastle in England, "but it could ultimately lead to the breakdown of relationships when women stop using the contraceptive pill, as odor perception plays a significant role in maintaining attraction to partners."

Here's the link for the current study on the Proceedings B of The Royal Society: Biological Sciences journal.

It's interesting that this finding first was published 11 years ago, without any fanfare. Here is that older study (1997), which also found that "the MHC or linked genes influence human mate choice." The earlier study's abstract is also from Proceedings B of The Royal Society: Biological Sciences:

Their [121 men's and women's] scorings of pleasantness correlated negatively with the degree of MHC similarity between smeller and T-shirt-wearer in men and women not using the contraceptive pill (but not in Pill-users).

Meaning, the Pill users were attracted to those with more-similar MHC smells. (Remember, "the best mates are those that have different MHC smells than you.")

I'll leave the details of my own personal history out of this, but as I was on the Pill for well over 10 years to try to stem the advance of my endometriosis, suffice to say that isn't this a "well, well, well!" This explains a LOT!

----------------------------------

1997 study:
Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity? Authors C. Wedekind, S. Füri
Proceedings B of The Royal Society: Biological Sciences
Issue Volume 264, Number 1387/October 22, 1997
Pages 1471-1479
Full text

2008 study:
MHC-correlated odour preferences in humans and the use of oral contraceptives
Proceedings B of The Royal Society: Biological Sciences
Authors S. Craig Roberts, L. Morris Gosling, Vaughan Carter, Marion Petrie
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2008.0825
Online Date Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Full text

Cross-posted on ProlifeBlogs.

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please) << HOME

FREEDOM OF RELIGION, FREEDOM OF SPEECH, FREEDOM OF THE PRESS NOTICES: From its inception in 2003 forward, the postings on this site are the co-bloggers' own personal opinions, observations and research, do not reflect or represent the views of any employer(s), past, present or future, nor do/will they relate in any manner to said employer(s) or their businesses at any point in time. The writings expressed herein are protected expression by virtue of the First Amendment of the United States of America AND by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in particular Articles 18 and 19, signed by the U.S.A. in 1948:
1) The First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
"The Free Exercise Clause reserves the right of American citizens to accept any religious belief and engage in religious rituals. The wording in the free-exercise clauses of state constitutions that religious “[o]pinion, expression of opinion, and practice were all expressly protected” by the Free Exercise Clause.[1] The clause protects not just religious beliefs but actions made on behalf of those beliefs. More importantly, the wording of state constitutions suggest that “free exercise envisions religiously compelled exemptions from at least some generally applicable laws.”[2] The Free Exercise Clause not only protects religious belief and expression; it also seems to allow for violation of laws, as long as that violation is made for religious reasons."
2) Article 18 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, signed by the U.S.A. in 1948, states: "Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance."
3) Article 19 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of the physical, emotional, social and spiritual negative effects of abortion on women, men and families, and to provide resources for help and information to anyone experiencing these effects or trying to help those who are. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit or compensation of any kind.

Copyright © 2003-2023 Annie Banno, After Abortion Blog. All Rights Reserved. This blog, its sister blog AbortionPundit Blog and all their contributors are not and have not ever been affiliated with or working with AfterAbortion.org, The Elliott Institute or Dr. David Reardon.

"Skews" Reporting ™ is a trademark of Annie Banno Copyright © 2004-2023. All Rights Reserved. All original content by the weblog author(s) is protected by copyright(s). This includes writings, artwork, photographs, and other forms of authorship protected by current U.S. Copyright Law, especially as described in Sections 102(a) and 103. PERMISSION GRANTED FOR UNLIMITED BUT NON-COMMERCIAL AND ONLY RESPECTING-ALL-HUMAN-LIFE USE. CREDIT REQUIRED. No rights in any copyrighted material, whether exclusive or non-exclusive, may be transferred in the absence of a written agreement that is the product of the parties' negotiations, fully approved by independent counsel retained by the author(s) and formally executed with manual signatures by all parties to the agreement pursuant to the statutory requirements of Section 204(a) of current U.S. Copyright Law, Federal Copyright Act of 1976, appendices and provisions.

Syndication

Atom feed

After abortion

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Contributors -- Email

WHO WE ARE

POST-ABORTION help:

PREGNANT & need help?

COMMENTING RULES

Abortion in the arts:

Resources for healing

Resources for information

Other links of interest

Activism

Blogs we read

Pro-Choice Blogs

Syndication