After abortion: ProChoice.com?

REAL, CONFIDENTIAL, FREE, NON-JUDGMENTAL HELP TO AVOID ABORTION, FROM MANY PLACES:

3,400 confidential and totally free groups to call and go to in the U.S...1,400 outside the U.S.	. . . 98 of these in Canada.
Free, financial help given to women and families in need.	More help given to women, families.
Helping with mortgage payments and more.	More help.
The $1,950 need has been met!	CPCs help women with groceries, clothing, cribs, "safe haven" places.
Help for those whose babies have	Down Syndrome and Other Birth Defects.
	CALL 1-888-510-BABY or click on the picture on the left, if you gave birth or are about to and can't care for your baby, to give your baby to a worker at a nearby hospital (some states also include police stations or fire stations), NO QUESTIONS ASKED. YOU WON'T GET IN ANY TROUBLE or even have to tell your name; Safehaven people will help the baby be adopted and cared for.

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

ProChoice.com?

Found this old website, calling itself ProChoice.com, and talking about safety of abortion and thought it had some other interesting things to say:

What this Web Site is about
Know up front that this site is ProWoman!
I hope you have just understood that this is a challenge for you and all to consider what constitutes a good choice. The term "Prochoice" being promoted predominantly in most media as only one choice, the choice of abortion. What else is there? Why is that the only choice? Because if you believe what some say, if you don't promote abortion you are anti-choice. This site partially exists so this lame argument is brought to light.
As of yet, I have not seen that occur with Planned Parenthood. Ask someone who has been there that would be honest about it. The WebMaster was (note:WAS) VERY for abortion, and has been privy to much of the inner workings and motivations behind the industry. If you look at the lower section of the home page it reads: "This Site is dedicated to all the women that were told they had a choice, but never had it explained to them that there is more than one. " Someone challenged the WebMaster to seriously evaluate arguments for and against and let them stand on their own merit. The findings were shocking! It is very hard to "peel away" feelings to see the facts. We are hoping that this site will post the most accurate information possible. (So if you have any, let us know.) Abortion advocates have shamefully acted like the tobacco industry did in the past, trying to say there are no harmful effects. From everything we have found so far, Abortion would be the absolute worst choice out of all that are available. Which brings me to an important point... An abortion is recognized as a medical procedure. Ask yourself; What would qualify an individual to recommend a medical procedure? (let alone a web site)

That's a really good point I've never heard made before. And they do a great job with this graphic summarizing how the issue isn't just two sides of a coin, it is really four sides of a diamond.

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please) << HOME

FREEDOM OF RELIGION, FREEDOM OF SPEECH, FREEDOM OF THE PRESS NOTICES: From its inception in 2003 forward, the postings on this site are the co-bloggers' own personal opinions, observations and research, do not reflect or represent the views of any employer(s), past, present or future, nor do/will they relate in any manner to said employer(s) or their businesses at any point in time. The writings expressed herein are protected expression by virtue of the First Amendment of the United States of America AND by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in particular Articles 18 and 19, signed by the U.S.A. in 1948:
1) The First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
"The Free Exercise Clause reserves the right of American citizens to accept any religious belief and engage in religious rituals. The wording in the free-exercise clauses of state constitutions that religious “[o]pinion, expression of opinion, and practice were all expressly protected” by the Free Exercise Clause.[1] The clause protects not just religious beliefs but actions made on behalf of those beliefs. More importantly, the wording of state constitutions suggest that “free exercise envisions religiously compelled exemptions from at least some generally applicable laws.”[2] The Free Exercise Clause not only protects religious belief and expression; it also seems to allow for violation of laws, as long as that violation is made for religious reasons."
2) Article 18 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, signed by the U.S.A. in 1948, states: "Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance."
3) Article 19 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of the physical, emotional, social and spiritual negative effects of abortion on women, men and families, and to provide resources for help and information to anyone experiencing these effects or trying to help those who are. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit or compensation of any kind.

Copyright © 2003-2023 Annie Banno, After Abortion Blog. All Rights Reserved. This blog, its sister blog AbortionPundit Blog and all their contributors are not and have not ever been affiliated with or working with AfterAbortion.org, The Elliott Institute or Dr. David Reardon.

"Skews" Reporting ™ is a trademark of Annie Banno Copyright © 2004-2023. All Rights Reserved. All original content by the weblog author(s) is protected by copyright(s). This includes writings, artwork, photographs, and other forms of authorship protected by current U.S. Copyright Law, especially as described in Sections 102(a) and 103. PERMISSION GRANTED FOR UNLIMITED BUT NON-COMMERCIAL AND ONLY RESPECTING-ALL-HUMAN-LIFE USE. CREDIT REQUIRED. No rights in any copyrighted material, whether exclusive or non-exclusive, may be transferred in the absence of a written agreement that is the product of the parties' negotiations, fully approved by independent counsel retained by the author(s) and formally executed with manual signatures by all parties to the agreement pursuant to the statutory requirements of Section 204(a) of current U.S. Copyright Law, Federal Copyright Act of 1976, appendices and provisions.

Syndication

Atom feed

After abortion

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

ProChoice.com?

Contributors -- Email

WHO WE ARE

POST-ABORTION help:

PREGNANT & need help?

COMMENTING RULES

Abortion in the arts:

Resources for healing

Resources for information

Other links of interest

Activism

Blogs we read

Pro-Choice Blogs

Syndication